Foot In The Mouth DAP MP Tony Pua!
DAP MP Tony Pua, like his mentor Lim Guan Eng, suffers from illusion of grandeur. This PJ Utara MP enjoys being praised that he is a graduate from Oxford and fancy himself being very clever.
He thinks he is an economist and a clever entrepreneur but we all know that he is a failed businessman. His Cyber Village Sdn Bhd company was a flop. He had a huge pile of debts and he is now telling us how to run Malaysia. This arrogant bugger cannot even run his own tiny company.
But what we like to expose is his many inaccuracies which his zombie supporters always overlooked. That includes the pro-Pakatan Rakyat outfit, Malaysiakini. Recently, Tony Pua was ordered by the High Court to pay RM200,000 following a defamation suit by Syabas.
Tony Pua, a Johorean, who had spent most of his time in Singapore, of course got his facts all wrong. He was stripped naked. In fact, the High Court should have increased the amount to teach this fellow a lesson.
This MP also imagined himself as a defence expert. Maybe he is eyeing for the Defence Minister’s job should Pakatan Rakyat comes to power. In his dream, perhaps.
But he was given a lecture by a real defence analyst Dzirhan Mahadzir recently who exposed that Tony Pua was making unreasonable comparisons when he claimed that the Defence Ministry is going to pay up to 8.7 times more for the warships it is proposing of buying.
According to Dzirhan, a correspondent for noted defence magazine Jane’s Defence Weekly, this is because the specifications of the vessels mentioned by Pua vary.
“Some warships he compared are less in tonnage and size than the (vessels proposed for purchase)…so it is like comparing a Mini Cooper to a four-wheel drive in price,” he said in a lengthy commentary on his Facebook page.
It is also very difficult to make comparisons by dividing price by tonnage as even similar sized ships can come in very different specifications, he said.
“Even if (the ships) are similar in size, the type of equipment they mount such as weapons, electronics, engines … and their design, along with construction material … make substantial differences in price.”
Dzirhan, who is also published in academic journals and had lectured at the Royal Military College, said that the time the ships were ordered also plays a significant role in determining price.
For example, he pointed out, the contract for the Israel Saar V (right) offshore patrol vessel (OPV) mentioned by Pua in his press statement yesterday was made in the early 1980s.
Nevertheless, the ship which cost US$260 million (RM791 million) is about RM200 million cheaper than the RM1 billion budgeted by the Defence Ministry for each OPV, and which has similar specifications.
Both have anti-air and anti-ship missiles, anti-submarine weapons and a helicopter hangar and helipad.
“Finally, a contract for a ship is not just for the ship but also for maintenance, support, training and delivery,” he said, noting that negotiations could bring down the cost of these aspects.
The analyst also said Pua’s comparison to the US Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) is also wrong because the function is completely different to that of the OPV.
While the vessel was budgeted to be built at a price of US$300 million (RM913 million), the final cost was US$637 million (RM1.93 billion) and US$704 million (RM2.14 billion) for each of the two different designs purchased, he said.
On Pua’s contention that the Defence Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi is announcing the budget of RM6 billion for six warships before the price has been finalised, Dzirhan said this is a common practice.
“The problem is Pua (left) confuses a letter of intent…and OPV announcement as an actual contract. A potential value is announced by the government in a letter of intent for various reasons.
“However, it is often not the actual value when the contract occurs, particularly in regard to complex arms purchases.”
Previously, one of the most common complaints of defence companies was that Malaysian government often would not provide indications of how much a potential deal is worth, said Dzirhan.
“(This) made it hard for companies to justify their efforts to shareholders and investors and also obtain financial backing,” he added.
Source: Stop The Lies